What LatAm's Job Market Won't Tell You (But Pablo Killian Will)
What the LatAm Job Market Isn't Telling You (But Pablo Killian Is)
HR Top Voices — June 2026 Edition
What is HR Top Voices
HR Top Voices is Desky's series where we give a platform to HR leaders and innovators across Latin America.
🎯 Why We Chose Pablo Killian
In a sector overflowing with generic talk about "flexibility" and "future talent," Pablo bridges two worlds that rarely intersect: talent acquisition and personal branding. That makes him uniquely positioned to understand the market from both sides of the desk: the company hunting for talent and the professional trying to get found.
There's a phrase that gets repeated at every HR conference, in every industry newsletter, on every LinkedIn panel:
"Today's companies are looking for adaptability, flexibility, and continuous learning."
Pablo Killian has been hearing it for years. And every time he hears it, he thinks the same thing: it's true for a slice of the market. And it's completely irrelevant for the rest.
"That narrative describes less than 40% of the market. The remaining 60% are SMEs still looking for exactly what they've always wanted: proven experience, commitment, and solid credentials. Except now it costs them twice as much to find it."
Pablo runs KLN Talent Access, a recruitment consulting firm specializing in hiring for small and medium-sized enterprises across Latin America. He also works as a Career Development and Personal Branding consultant for senior professionals looking to reposition themselves or make a leap in their careers. He's spent years operating in the gap between what the market claims it's looking for and what actually happens when you need to fill an open position by Friday.
What follows is what he's learned.
The Real Shift Isn't What Companies Are Looking For. It's How Much It Costs to Find It.
SMEs make up more than 90% of companies in Latin America and generate over 60% of regional employment. Yet they almost never make the headlines about "the future of work." Those headlines go to big multinationals and tech companies, which concentrate the most visible profiles and the most aspirational jobs—but they represent a tiny fraction of the actual job market.
Pablo knows this better than most. His day-to-day work doesn't happen in corporate offices with cutting-edge wellness policies and premium benefits. It happens in the trenches: helping SMEs find the right candidate in a market where qualified talent is scarce.
Globally, 75% of companies can't fill their open positions. In Argentina, that number hits 76%, according to ManpowerGroup. That's not a minor stat: it means three out of four companies right now are operating with at least one unfilled role.
"What changed over the last three years isn't the attributes companies are looking for. What changed is how much it actually costs to find them. And on top of that, there's a new layer: AI literacy. It didn't replace reliability or experience. It stacked on top of them."
Much has been said about AI replacing skills. Pablo sees it differently: it hasn't replaced anything; it's accumulated. Companies with options now want reliability, proven experience, and AI tool proficiency. Those without options—the majority—are learning to work with what they can find and training on the job.
Why Every Resume Looks the Same (And What to Do About It)
There's a structural problem in the recruitment market that AI has amplified exponentially: profile homogenization. Today, with access to ChatGPT and a half-decent prompt, any candidate can generate a polished resume that sounds professional, uses all the right keywords, and is well-structured. The problem is that everyone can do it. And everyone does.
"The most common mistake I see is failing to stand out. A resume that reads like a job description—a list of tasks, a list of responsibilities—doesn't automatically disqualify you, but it makes every profile look exactly the same."
AI, used poorly, manufactures generic. Without the right context—without the actual data about the person, without their concrete achievements, without the metrics backing up their work—the result is always the same: a resume that could belong to anybody. And a resume that could belong to anybody doesn't belong to anyone.
"Using keywords is fine and necessary, but the framework and context need to make sense and be differentiating. Without solid foundational information, AI gives you mediocre results."
According to Pablo, the solution isn't writing better or finding the right prompt. It's having more to say.
"Specific accomplishments, real metrics, problems you solved, how many people you impacted. That's what sets you apart. And AI alone can't invent that."
A resume is a document that sums up what you've lived. If what you've lived lacks depth, no tool is going to fabricate it. What AI can do is organize and present better what already exists. What it can't do is create substance where there is none.
LinkedIn Isn't a Job Board. And Almost Nobody Uses It Right.
This is one of the points where Pablo really digs in. And he's right to, because the confusion is widespread.
Most people looking for work treat LinkedIn like a glorified job board: complete your profile so recruiters find you, apply to posted positions, and wait. It's a valid strategy but incomplete, and it underestimates what the platform can actually do.
"LinkedIn is a social network and networking platform first, a job board second. If we move and connect appropriately, people are going to cross paths with our profile 'by chance' much more often than a recruiter will ever see it."
A complete profile with the right keywords is the foundation. But there's a layer above that very few work on: the profile as a signal of active presence. An updated, well-maintained profile tells a recruiter that this person will probably respond quickly if they try to connect. The algorithm factors that in too.
"A complete, updated profile tells me it's more likely that person is paying attention to their profile and will get back to me in a timely way if I reach out."
But beyond being found by recruiters, there's the network effect: every connection, every comment, every piece of content circulates your profile among people who aren't recruiters but who might open a door. For that, Pablo highlights two elements in particular.
The first is your headline. Not your job title. Your headline has to do something very specific: make whoever sees it clearly remember what you do. In a LinkedIn feed where endless scrolling is the norm, the headline is all that sticks in memory.
The second is your banner. Almost nobody works on it.
"Your profile banner can help a lot. For me, it needs to be a complement to your headline message, not just a pretty landscape photo."
These seem like minor details. They're not. In a market where the difference between getting contacted and being ignored can be a matter of seconds of attention, every element of your profile matters.
What ChatGPT Can't Solve: The Single Profile Problem
There's an asymmetry most candidates don't consider: you can personalize your resume for each application. Your LinkedIn profile, you can't.
When you apply for a position with a resume optimized for that specific role, you can adjust the language, reorder sections, highlight specific accomplishments. But your LinkedIn profile is one single, public profile that everyone sees at the same time: the recruiter from the company you applied to today, the contact who found you organically, the former colleague who wants to recommend you, and the future client evaluating whether to hire you.
"Your LinkedIn profile becomes more important because we can't change it for each role we apply to."
This has a direct implication: all the energy you invest in optimizing your resume for each position should be invested—in equal measure—in building a solid, coherent, updated LinkedIn profile. A profile that works well in any context, for any audience, at any moment.
And there's another trap Pablo pinpoints with precision: the applicant who just applies for the sake of it.
"Another way to make sure you stand out is by not just applying to every position out there when you don't have the experience or aligned skills."
The logic is clear: mass-applying to roles you don't qualify for isn't just a waste of time. It dilutes your message. It sends confusing signals to the market about who you are and what you want. And in an ecosystem where reputation travels—especially in small industries or tight-knit markets—that has a real cost.
What Separates Someone With Experience From Someone Who Actually Grew
There's a distinction experienced recruiters make almost instinctively, though they rarely articulate it clearly. Pablo does.
The favorite follow-up question from any solid interviewer isn't about the responsibilities of your last role. It's much simpler: Can you tell me more about that?
"When you dig deeper into a particular situation, people who really know their stuff see it as a chance to shine. Their answers are detailed and fluid. But when someone didn't have real depth in their experience, the answers get short, simple, and vague."
It's the difference between someone who was somewhere and someone who really lived there. Between someone who executed tasks and someone who made decisions, faced consequences, and learned from them.
Years in a position guarantee nothing. Your narrative does. And your narrative doesn't improvise itself: it's the accumulated result of having paid attention, of having been curious, of wanting to understand why things work the way they do.
There's a second indicator Pablo mentions: growth in responsibilities within the same organization.
"Role changes and growth in responsibilities within the same organization are also a good sign that you can verify through their narrative."
Someone who started as an analyst and left as a team lead has a story to tell. Someone who stayed in the same position for five years without anything around them changing also has a story to tell—but it's a different story. The interview is where you figure out which is which.
How to Stay Sane While Job Hunting in LatAm Today
Looking for work is exhausting. Not necessarily because the process is long—though it often is—but because it operates on emotionally unstable ground: uncertainty, recruiter silence, unexplained rejections, the feeling that you're doing everything right but getting nowhere.
Pablo doesn't minimize that. But he has a clear stance on how to handle it.
First: filter out the noise.
"First: disconnect from unnecessary social media noise. A lot of posts about ATS, ghosting, and automatic filters are clickbait or people venting frustration without real substance. Look for actual advice from trusted people."
The point about digital reputation is relevant here too: everything you share and comment on in networks becomes part of your public profile. Recruiters see it. Companies see it. A candidate posting complaints about the job market is building an image that could work against them before they even get to a first interview.
Second: limit your job search time.
"There aren't enough opportunities out there for eight-hour job searches every single day to be possible or productive. It's healthy to allocate a certain amount of time per day to your search and then focus your mind on something else: sports, a hobby, learning an instrument."
Job hunting shouldn't be an identity. It's an activity with set hours. When it becomes the only thing that exists, anxiety takes over and your decision-making gets sloppy: you apply to anything, you accept any offer, you lose your judgment.
Third—and Pablo really emphasizes this one—is self-knowledge.
"Self-knowledge is key. Understanding something as basic as your behavioral profile can help you understand a lot about your natural motivations and why you're drawn to certain tasks while others drain you."
It's not self-help psychology. It's strategic information. Knowing what types of environments energize you and which drain you, what kinds of problems genuinely interest you and which bore you: all of that informs better job search decisions than any list of aspirational companies.
The Real Job Market Isn't in the Job Postings
This might be the most uncomfortable idea in this whole conversation. Uncomfortable because it means the strategy most people use—applying to posted positions and waiting—is structurally limited.
"The best networking is what we do when we don't need it yet. It's like a bank account: I need to deposit and proactively add value to my network if I expect to get something out of it later. Posted jobs aren't the 'real' job market. A lot of opportunities never get posted and get filled through contacts."
The trend is consistent: a significant portion of roles that get filled never make it to a job posting. They get resolved through internal referrals, recommendations from trusted contacts, informal conversations that turn into concrete offers.
That means someone who built an active network of contacts, stayed visible in their industry, and genuinely added value to their professional circle before needing anything has access to a much broader job market than anything you'll find on any job board.
The downside is obvious: building that network takes time. It doesn't happen in moments of urgency.
"If you're already in search and without a job it's a bit more limited and less natural because of the urgency. But the best networking is what we do when we don't need it yet."
The Industry You Don't Know Might Be Exactly What You Need
There's a search bias Pablo observes frequently that unnecessarily narrows your field of possibilities: the tendency to job hunt only in industries you already know.
It makes sense. It's easier to talk about your experience in a familiar context. But in a job market shifting rapidly, that logic can become a trap.
"I see a lot of people looking for jobs based on their experience only in industries they know, and that's a very limited script given the variety of opportunities opening up today and the sudden changes we're seeing and will continue to see."
The key is identifying which skills transfer. An HR professional with tech experience has capabilities perfectly applicable to healthcare, retail, manufacturing. A financial analyst from the energy sector can bring their expertise to a fintech startup. Competencies usually travel across industries better than most people think.
"Learning about other industries and figuring out which of your skills transfer to other roles or businesses can help you think about your job search more broadly and hopefully more positively. This can be one of the big payoffs of networking: instead of just using it to ask for a job, use it to learn about other industries."
Networking, in this sense, isn't just a channel for getting referrals. It's an exploration tool. Every conversation with someone in a different sector is a chance to understand how that world works, what problems it solves, what kind of talent it needs.
The Three Pieces of Advice That Sum It All Up
At the end of the conversation, we asked Pablo to close with the essentials. Here's what he said, no hedging:
One: self-knowledge and honest self-assessment. Ideally with help—a coach, a mentor, someone you trust who can give outside perspective. Knowing yourself well is the foundation of any career strategy that makes sense.
Two: strategic and proactive networking. Build and maintain a network of contacts not as a mechanism for asking favors, but as a long-term investment. The best times to network are the ones not marked by urgency. When urgency comes, your network needs to already be there.
Three: use networks to connect and search, but filter out the noise and complaints. LinkedIn can be a huge asset or a paralyzing source of anxiety, depending on how you use it. The difference comes down to how much you filter and what criteria you use to decide what to consume and what to ignore.
What Excites Him About Talent in the Region
After years watching recruitment processes, accumulated frustrations, candidates who don't get found, and companies that can't find what they're looking for, we asked Pablo what gives him hope about the current landscape.
His answer was immediate.
"What excites me most is the entrepreneurial spirit spreading across the region and how new generations are more driven to build their own business or join a startup than to be part of a big corporation or follow traditional career paths."
It's a mindset shift with deep implications for the job market. A generation preferring the calculated risk of building something of their own over the relative comfort of a corporate position is also a generation that brings that mentality when working as an employee: more results-oriented, more comfortable with uncertainty, more likely to solve problems without waiting for instructions.
"The talent in the region is also much more connected with the rest of the world and showing its potential."
Remote work globalization accelerated something already happening: Latin American talent now competes in a global market. It's exposed to international standards, different ways of working, organizational cultures that were once out of reach. That exposure has a formative effect beyond just earning in dollars.
The LatAm job market is more complex, more demanding, and more interesting than the major headlines suggest. Pablo Killian knows this. And if anything came through in this conversation, it's that understanding it well—with all its contradictions, its unique features, and its real opportunities—is the most underestimated competitive advantage out there.
Pablo Killian is Director of KLN Talent Access, a recruitment consulting firm for SMEs across Latin America, and a Career Development and Personal Branding consultant for senior professionals looking to improve their positioning and design a new chapter in their careers.
Does your team work from more than one city?
Desky gives every member of your team access to coworking spaces across Latin America and Europe — no country-by-country contracts, no fixed costs, and full visibility for HR.
Published by the Desky team — June 2026